A much more detailed argument

Posted October 21st, 2008 under , , , , , , , ,

Let’s face it, there are people more articulate and with more time on their hands to focus on politics (well, you may question that if you follow me on twitter).

It’s no secret I’ll be voting for John McCain come Nov 4.  He’s not a perfect match for the job and there are issues I have with him.  To me, however, the comparison to Barrack Obama puts him ahead.  Here are two articles that do a much better job and summarizing the issues I have with an Obama/Biden presidency.

 
CLOSING THE DEAL
A Roadmap for Campaign 2008’s Homestretch
By Guy Benson (www.guybensonshow.com) and Mary Katharine Ham (www.weeklystandard.com)
Editor and Contributor, Ed Morrissey

Biden Was Wrong On the Cold War 
By Peter Wehner 
ARTICLE
Wall Street Journal   
Publication Date: September 4, 2008

Related posts

a little red hen

Posted October 14th, 2008 under , , , , ,

Someone shared this with me in email:

 

Once upon a time, on a farm in Virginia , there was a little red hen who scratched about the barnyard until she uncovered quite a few grains of wheat.
She called all of her Democrat neighbors together and said, ‘If we plant this wheat, we shall have bread to eat. Who will help me plant it?’
‘Not I,’ said the cow.
‘Not I,’ said the duck.
‘Not I,’ said the pig.
‘Not I,’ said the goose.
‘Then I will do it by myself,’ said the little red hen, and so she did.  

 

The wheat grew very tall and ripened into golden grain.
‘Who will help me reap my wheat?’ asked the little red hen.
‘Not I,’ said the duck..
‘Out of my classification,’ said the pig.
‘I’d lose my seniority,’ said the cow.
‘I’d lose my unemployment compensation,’ said the goose.
‘Then I will do it by myself,’ said the little red hen, and so she did.

 

At last it came time to bake the bread.
‘Who will help me bake the bread?’ asked the little red hen.
‘That would be overtime for me,’ said the cow.
‘I’d lose my welfare benefits,’ said the duck.
‘I’m a dropout and never learned how,’ said the pig.
‘If I’m to be the only helper, that’s discrimination,’ said the goose.
‘Then I will do it by myself,’ said the little red hen.

 

She baked five loaves and held them up for all of her neighbors to see.  They wanted some and, in fact, demanded a share. But the little red hen said, ‘No, I shall eat all five loaves.’
‘Excess profits!’ cried the cow. (Nancy Pelosi)
‘Capitalist leech!’ screamed the duck. (Barbara Boxer)
‘I demand equal rights!’ yelled the goose. (Jesse Jackson)
The pig just grunted in disdain. (Ted Kennedy)
And they all painted ‘Unfair!’ picket signs and marched around and around the little red hen, shouting obscenities.

 

Then the farmer (Obama) came. He said to the little red hen, ‘You must not be so greedy.’
‘But I earned the bread,’ said the little red hen.
‘Exactly,’ said Barack the farmer. ‘That is what makes our free enterprise system so wonderful. Anyone in the barnyard can earn as much as he wants. But under our modern government regulations, the productive workers must divide the fruits of their labor with those who are lazy and idle.’
And they all lived happily ever after, including the little red hen, who smiled and clucked, ‘I am grateful, for now I truly understand.’
But her neighbors became quite disappointed in her.
She never again baked bread because she joined the ‘party’ and got her bread free.
And all the Democrats smiled. ‘Fairness’ had been established.
Individual initiative had died, but nobody noticed; 
Perhaps no one cared…so long as there was free bread that ‘the rich’ were paying for.

 

EPILOGUE

Bill Clinton is getting $12 million for his memoirs.
Hillary got $8 million for hers.
That’s $20 million for the memories from two people, who for eight years, repeatedly testified, under oath, that they couldn’t remember anything.

 

IS THIS A GREAT BARNYARD OR WHAT?  DON’T FORGET TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER

Related posts

More Fairness in Politics and Blogging

Posted September 19th, 2008 under , , , , ,

Like I’ve said, character and honesty are critical for me in relating to a person.  A reflection of who a person is is the people he surrounds himself with.

Senator Obama has stated his disdain for the prejudice comments by Reverend Wright and the terrorist actions of Bill Ayers.  Obama didn’t do those things and as soon as the press let him know about the actions of these loose associations in his life, it took him less then a couple of months to distance himself and state his dislike for what they did (and that he was unaware of the hateful things they said/did).

I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.  Why would a politician play with the truth?

Now, we have the Post reporting that Obama’s campaign reached out Franklin Raines for advice on the economy and mortgate industry.  Further, we know that James Johnson was in charge of Obama’s VP selection team until there was too much criticism.  Who cares, really, right?  Oh, Raines and Johnson used to run FNME (Fannie Mae) during the periods when it was discovered that they artificially inflated their reported revenue, used suspect business practices in granting loans and other illegal activities.  Both left FNME after receiving MILLIONS (like $50m in Raines’ case) in bonuses.  

Further, there’s the protest of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s visit to the UN.  Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin were both invited.  When Clinton found out Palin was coming, she pulled out.  In order to remain party neutral, the group reached out to Biden and the Obama campaign to send someone else.  They refused.  The group then got pressure from other democrats to either disinvite Palin or cancel the rally.  So, they disinvited her.  What kind of crap is this?  It’s more important to ensure Palin doesn’t attend than it is to protest Iran’s ruler?

Related posts

Fairness in Politics and Blogging

Posted September 16th, 2008 under , , , ,

There ain’t no such thing… Everyone is biased.  It’s who we are, how we are made up.  Other than claiming that McCain is too old to be President or votes too close to party lines, there has been little the liberal pundits and bloggers have been able to attack him on from a character perspective.  Instead, they’ve focused on Governor Sarah Palin.  Her religion is different than their’s, she wasn’t pregnant - she covered up for her daughter’s pregnancy, no, wait, she should stay home and take care of her family because her 17 yr old daughter is engaged and pregnant, her marriage is going to go to hell because she’s a working mother, she looks like Tina Fey, she’s a war monger, she’s a puppet, she’s a liar, she’s despicable, a sign of pure evil on the horizon.  I’ve read all of these online by “professional” media and bloggers.  

I’m not going to defend her today, there are enough people out there doing it themselves.  But in case folks forget, it’s McCain running against Obama.  Say what you want about his days being numbered, Matt Damon, but you’ve brought up the issue about character.  Let’s look at Obama’s character:

 

 

Character and honesty is important to me.  I think Obama is not quite the saint that some (including himself) would like to paint him as.  Normally, that’s ok.  But this isn’t a job interview.  This is for the Presidency of the United States of America.  Sure, I want change.  I want honesty from politicians and fairness in reporting.

Related posts

Change

Posted September 15th, 2008 under , , , , , , ,

Both candidates are running on a platform of change.  Ultimately, this speaks to most Americans.  Everyone wants…

  • to pay less taxes (although some feel others should pay more [inserted for attempted fairness])
  • live a life free of fear from terrorists
  • be less dependent on foreign powers for energy
  • eliminate government corruption
  • feel the government represents their ideals and beliefs (or lack thereof)
  • a government that doesn’t dictate to the individual how to think or feel
  • a good job, healthcare and comfortable retirement
While we often disagree on the “how”, the overall “what” we want is pretty universal.  In other words, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”.  
Back to change… Change implies discontent with how things are.  Again, I think we can all get behind that.  To both candidates, it also seems to mean to get away from President Bush.  Since they both seem to agree on that point, it doesn’t make for good politics and we really don’t hear much about it.  So, the definition of change really comes back to the details and personal interpretation.
Change for me is a move away from partisan politics and a focus on government for (ALL) the people.  I want my senator or representative to represent me regardless of my political affiliation.  Same goes for my president.  I’m tired of the fighting, corruption and manipulation for personal gain and power.
Both candidates emphasize their bipartisan approach for change, but their records show a different take.
The Washington Times compared the number of bills both senators led or signed onto since Senator Obama joined in 2005.
…since 2005, Mr. McCain has led as chief sponsor of 82 bills, on which he had 120 Democratic co-sponsors out of 220 total, for an average of 55 percent. He worked with Democrats on 50 of his bills, and of those, 37 times Democrats outnumber Republicans as co-sponsors.
Mr. Obama, meanwhile, sponsored 120 bills, of which Republicans co-sponsored just 26, and on only five bills did Republicans outnumber Democrats. Mr. Obama gained 522 total Democratic co-sponsors but only 75 Republicans, for an average of 13 percent of his co-sponsors.
Additionally, the areas where Senator McCain broke from the Republican party on include climate change, out-of-control spending, torture,  campaign-finance overhaul, immigration, a patients’ bill of rights, gun control and tax cuts.  At the Saddleback Church forum on values, Senator Obama “said his major break with Democrats came on congressional ethics, when he sponsored a bill to curb meals and gifts from lobbyists”.
When asked for comments, Senators Dorgan, Kennedy and Feingold, top Democrats who co-sponsored bills with McCain, chose to not comment.  Senator Obama’s aid stated that Senator Lugar (R-Indiana) would back up the claims of bipartisan-ism.  Senator Lugar must not have gotten the memo.  His response was that he respects Obama, thinks he’s a good guy, passed a couple of meaningful pieces of legislation, but “hasn’t gone head-to-head against his leadership when it mattered: “Where have you seen him challenge the status quo?”"
Many right-wing conservatives do not like McCain because they feel he gets along with the Democrats too well.  Obama’s only suggestion of “change” comes down to anything but Republican.  
I think it was in McCain’s RNC acceptance speech where he said he didn’t care where the good ideas came from.  That’s who I want leading my country… representing me.  Not someone who is going to disregard a large section of the population because they aren’t like him, believe what he believes or because his party told him to.

Related posts