A much more detailed argument

Posted October 21st, 2008 under , , , , , , , ,

Let’s face it, there are people more articulate and with more time on their hands to focus on politics (well, you may question that if you follow me on twitter).

It’s no secret I’ll be voting for John McCain come Nov 4.  He’s not a perfect match for the job and there are issues I have with him.  To me, however, the comparison to Barrack Obama puts him ahead.  Here are two articles that do a much better job and summarizing the issues I have with an Obama/Biden presidency.

 
CLOSING THE DEAL
A Roadmap for Campaign 2008’s Homestretch
By Guy Benson (www.guybensonshow.com) and Mary Katharine Ham (www.weeklystandard.com)
Editor and Contributor, Ed Morrissey

Biden Was Wrong On the Cold War 
By Peter Wehner 
ARTICLE
Wall Street Journal   
Publication Date: September 4, 2008

Related posts

More Fairness in Politics and Blogging

Posted September 19th, 2008 under , , , , ,

Like I’ve said, character and honesty are critical for me in relating to a person.  A reflection of who a person is is the people he surrounds himself with.

Senator Obama has stated his disdain for the prejudice comments by Reverend Wright and the terrorist actions of Bill Ayers.  Obama didn’t do those things and as soon as the press let him know about the actions of these loose associations in his life, it took him less then a couple of months to distance himself and state his dislike for what they did (and that he was unaware of the hateful things they said/did).

I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.  Why would a politician play with the truth?

Now, we have the Post reporting that Obama’s campaign reached out Franklin Raines for advice on the economy and mortgate industry.  Further, we know that James Johnson was in charge of Obama’s VP selection team until there was too much criticism.  Who cares, really, right?  Oh, Raines and Johnson used to run FNME (Fannie Mae) during the periods when it was discovered that they artificially inflated their reported revenue, used suspect business practices in granting loans and other illegal activities.  Both left FNME after receiving MILLIONS (like $50m in Raines’ case) in bonuses.  

Further, there’s the protest of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s visit to the UN.  Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin were both invited.  When Clinton found out Palin was coming, she pulled out.  In order to remain party neutral, the group reached out to Biden and the Obama campaign to send someone else.  They refused.  The group then got pressure from other democrats to either disinvite Palin or cancel the rally.  So, they disinvited her.  What kind of crap is this?  It’s more important to ensure Palin doesn’t attend than it is to protest Iran’s ruler?

Related posts

Celebrities and Politics

Posted September 8th, 2008 under , , , , ,

In America, everyone has freedom of speech.  I can write my opinions here for anyone to read.  Obviously, I do not have the notoriety of a television actor, movie star, talk show host or well-known comedian, so do not garner any the same following.  Often, I’ll shake my head and swear that these people should just keep quiet when they decide the world would be better off knowing what they think about politics, but I still believe in their right to say what they want.

Just as she respects her co-hosts’ right hold different positions from her, I respect Whoopi Goldberg for coming out against name calling.  But I have a hard time that her message is truly from the heart and not just a veiled attempt to sling mud.  In a recent response to Governor Sarah Palin’s speech, Whoopi said Palin and her daughter would get a different treatment if they were black stating her own experience with her daughter as evidence.  Whoopi implies that conservatives feel residents of big cities like New York, LA or Chicago can not be patriots.  She complains about inaccuracies in the speech and then provides her own by stating Palin belonged to a group that promoted Alaska secede from the US (a rumour proven false).  She concludes by comparing the speech to a Nazi rally from the early 20th Century.

As for the issue of fair treatment due to race, I want to believe that there would be no difference if it was Obama and his wife’s daughter involved.  The sad fact is that there are still racists in this country and they will throw out their hate and ignorance.  I also don’t think that Whoopi’s personal life is really open for general consumption if she doesn’t want it to be.  The problem here is the mainstream media constantly lowering the quality bar on what is off limits and a growing reader base who will pick up whatever gossip exists.  They want to see that not everyone is better off than themselves.

I haven’t heard any statements either direct or implied that patriotism is dependent on location.  There is a defensive posture by those of us in the middle-lands (mid-west just makes no logistical sense) that these “big city politicians” often pander to the higher-populated cities and can/do make comments that denigrate our culture, beliefs or way of life.  This isn’t really new.  The East and West Coasts often forget there are several states in between and make fun of our less than cosmopolitan, “down home” way of life.  We don’t life sex and the city way of lives or hang out with our entourage.  We’re probably closer to Drew Carey, Friday Night Lights or that 70’s show.  We work the factories, heavy industry and the farmlands and I often am glad we have an electoral process and do not rely on “popular vote” to decide our leaders.

When McCain announced Palin as he running mate, the innerweb and mainstream media was inundated with lies both slanderous and trivial, half-truths and some relevant facts about her past.  The pure volume of hateful, ignorant articles can easily lead someone to believe there was malicious intent here.  Why someone who is so much in the public eye would not try harder to ensure her facts are correct boggles my mind.  In this area, I feel celebrities do have a responsibility to their public to not perpetuate rumours.  State your opinions, but be cautious with innuendo.  People will believe you no matter how many times you may come back later admitting you were wrong.

Whoopi’s conclusion that Palin’s speech and reception recalled images of a Nazi rally just amazes me.  I know it’s meant for impact of the reader, but that’s just an embarrassingly ridiculous comparison.  Promoting America is not promoting the “Aryan race”.  Not supporting rights for illegal aliens is not against immigration.  Having strong faith is not rounding up anyone of color, gay or any other minority and putting them in concentration camps.  What I don’t understand is the double standard being employed here.  It’s ok for democrats to talk about their viewpoints or beliefs, but if a republican does they are a nazi?

I really just don’t know how to respond to that last point.  From one of her followup articles, it appears that Whoopi feels there is still a strong desparity between blacks and whites in this country.  I can not disagree with her viewpoint there.  I lack the experience.  The same as I can’t comment on what it’s like being gay in America.  But I can say that stereotyping people is wrong.  I do not judge people on their race, sex, sexual relationships, marital status, age or anything else physically (well, maybe body odor… I don’t like smelly people).  I look at their experience, education, communication, sense of humor, intelligence and passion.  I would hope that I would be subjected to the stereotyping from democrats, but it appears I am.


Related posts

What I don’t understand about politics…

Posted August 29th, 2008 under , , , , , , , ,

ok, I’m not going to go into EVERYTHING I don’t understand about politics, because there is so much I don’t know that I don’t know.  I’m a generalizer… The voices agree that this isn’t the same thing as stereotyping.  Stereotyping is not good and assumes there really are no exceptions.  All cats are the same and completely unlike a dogs.  I know there are some cats that are more like dogs than some dogs.  But I’m simple and I need to generalize to be able to manage.

I’m a child of Cappra politics.  I want Mr. Smith to go to Washington… I want to vote for the American President… I want Dave to come in and balance the budget and just applying common sense to government.  But I’m an adult of modern America where one president sits on his ass letting the economy falter (dotcom, enron, etc) and have the next president take the fall; where America gets bombed, citizens on our own soil get murdered and years later we argue over the politics of oil and presidential mistakes in judgement.

So, here’s my random list of things I don’t understand about politics…

  • why do we have a political establishment that in all practical sense only allows the wealthy to run for office?
  • why do most bloggers or twitters fall to personal jabs in response to criticism of their candidates when we abhor our candidates doing such?
  • don’t people understand that neither extreme in parties would benefit this country?  We aren’t red or blue, we are purple, right?
  • I’m thrilled that a black man is running for president, but isn’t the historic event more important if we don’t talk about race other than acknowledge it? I’d feel the same about a woman (and do about Gov Sarah Palin).
  • Aren’t elderly a protected group in America?  Why is it right to criticize someone for being older then they are?  The average age of presidents taking office is 55, right? good, bad or otherwise…
  • does anyone think someone ever gets into a political office without making compromises?  Do they really think that changes as you become president?  Whatever they say they stand for is mostly what they think you want to hear to get your vote.
  • Shouldn’t we judge based on experience?  Why is picking a candidate any different from hiring a new employee?
  • why is it important how many houses someone owns or how many millions of dollars they paid for their home?  Politicians at the presidential candidate level are so far removed from the lower-to-middle class they really can’t relate on a personal level, right?  Why don’t people accept that and focus on real issues?
  • don’t people understand that in order for America to help wore-torn, impoverished, threatened nations, we need a strong military?  Leaders of these countries or the thugs, mercenaries, terrorists killing people won’t respect us telling them to stop if we aren’t willing to back it up.  if we don’t want to back it up, why do we care what happens there?  They could care less about sanctions or embargos.  and I’m not just talking the middle-east… I’m talking anywhere we scream out in outrage because of injustice or human sacrifice.
  • why don’t we learn how to better educate our children from the nations that are beating us (say Finland) and quit trying to fix things through more money or cutbacks?
  • why can’t people see that we need to cut our dependency on oil?  But to do that, we still need oil until we have a solution?  In short term, isn’t it more important to cut our dependency on middle-east oil?  Alaska wants to drill… it’s why they were made a state.  We have fields hundreds of miles off the coasts… why is this wrong?  Why can’t we do both (research/drive alternative fuels while breaking our middle-east oil dependency while supporting US industry)?
  • why do people think it’s ok to come to this country illegally?  Each year, thousands of people come to the US and become citizens legally after years of effort and hard work.  Why is citizenship something we should give away like candy on the corner?  Why is it ok to break the law and reward people who don’t even pay taxes?
  • why does the government care if two people get married?  What do my religious beliefs have to do with their decision?  How does that take anything away from me?

I really don’t think these are that complicated, but I’m sure I’m missing something.  Pick a path, execute and commit.

Related posts