I need to relax

Posted October 15th, 2008 under , , , ,

and take 5 deep breaths. The election will be over in a few weeks. Honestly, when you come right down to it, I think we’re splitting hairs on the candidates. They both have programs/platforms that the experts (tax, economy, healthcare) think won’t make a big difference and will ultimately cost us tax payers (different from registered voters) lots of money.

Mostly, I’m just gonna vote my gut, still debate with supporters from the other team cuz I like to debate, and make sure I don’t vote for any incumbents in Congress.  Congress has the lowest approval rating than Bush or any other Congress in reported history.  I don’t care party lines, if you are in office in congress now, you don’t have my vote.  Time for a house cleaning.

2 things I know to be true… I’m the King of ConleyWorld and I still like trees.

Related posts

Fannie Mae no better than Enron

Posted September 9th, 2008 under , , , , , , , ,

On May 23, 2006, as a jury in Houston deliberated the case against top Enron executives Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling, a little-known regulatory agency in Washington, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), released a study with the dryly bureaucratic title “Report of the Special Examination of Fannie Mae.”

During the years 1998-2004, while headed Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae was found guilty of illegally inflating their earnings by $10.6 billion.  The main reason was to increase their bonuses (Raines received around $50million additional bonus due to this) and overall executive compensation.  Raines’ base pay was $1million per year.

…as a result of the investigation, Fannie Mae has agreed to pay $400 million in penalties. The company is now under criminal investigation by the Justice Department, and will likely be in trouble with the Securities and Exchange Commission, too.

Raines and team fought the investigation, they fought proposed government regulation and had the support of several democrats in congress.  For two years a bill to increase regulation was stymied until it was finally passed with a straight party vote.  The argument against the bill was that it would hurt granting loans to low-to-middle class applicants.

So, how come this hasn’t been more widely covered since the report came out over 2 years ago?

Franklin Raines is the former Clinton budget director and a member of his senior staff at Fannie Mae during this time was former Clinton Justice Department official Jamie Gorelick.  She received $15million in bunuses related to the inflated profits.  She was also responsible for creating the communications wall between the CIA and FBI during the Clinton years while working in the Justice Department.

Fannie Mae legally donates to political campaigns.  These are the top 5 candidates they donated to:

Top Recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

 

Name Office Party/State Total
01. Dodd, Christopher J S D-CT $133,900
02. Kerry, John S D-MA $111,000
03. Obama, Barack S D-IL $105,849
04. Clinton, Hillary S D-NY $75,550
05. Kanjorski, Paul E H D-PA $65,500

Some analysis…

Total Contributions $1,386,426
Top 5 are Demotrats $491,799 35%  
16 of 25 are Democrats $966,778 70%  
9 of 25 are Republicans $419,648 30%  
   

So, why aren’t politicians all over this? Why isn’t the media tearing this apart?

Related posts

Celebrities and Politics

Posted September 8th, 2008 under , , , , ,

In America, everyone has freedom of speech.  I can write my opinions here for anyone to read.  Obviously, I do not have the notoriety of a television actor, movie star, talk show host or well-known comedian, so do not garner any the same following.  Often, I’ll shake my head and swear that these people should just keep quiet when they decide the world would be better off knowing what they think about politics, but I still believe in their right to say what they want.

Just as she respects her co-hosts’ right hold different positions from her, I respect Whoopi Goldberg for coming out against name calling.  But I have a hard time that her message is truly from the heart and not just a veiled attempt to sling mud.  In a recent response to Governor Sarah Palin’s speech, Whoopi said Palin and her daughter would get a different treatment if they were black stating her own experience with her daughter as evidence.  Whoopi implies that conservatives feel residents of big cities like New York, LA or Chicago can not be patriots.  She complains about inaccuracies in the speech and then provides her own by stating Palin belonged to a group that promoted Alaska secede from the US (a rumour proven false).  She concludes by comparing the speech to a Nazi rally from the early 20th Century.

As for the issue of fair treatment due to race, I want to believe that there would be no difference if it was Obama and his wife’s daughter involved.  The sad fact is that there are still racists in this country and they will throw out their hate and ignorance.  I also don’t think that Whoopi’s personal life is really open for general consumption if she doesn’t want it to be.  The problem here is the mainstream media constantly lowering the quality bar on what is off limits and a growing reader base who will pick up whatever gossip exists.  They want to see that not everyone is better off than themselves.

I haven’t heard any statements either direct or implied that patriotism is dependent on location.  There is a defensive posture by those of us in the middle-lands (mid-west just makes no logistical sense) that these “big city politicians” often pander to the higher-populated cities and can/do make comments that denigrate our culture, beliefs or way of life.  This isn’t really new.  The East and West Coasts often forget there are several states in between and make fun of our less than cosmopolitan, “down home” way of life.  We don’t life sex and the city way of lives or hang out with our entourage.  We’re probably closer to Drew Carey, Friday Night Lights or that 70’s show.  We work the factories, heavy industry and the farmlands and I often am glad we have an electoral process and do not rely on “popular vote” to decide our leaders.

When McCain announced Palin as he running mate, the innerweb and mainstream media was inundated with lies both slanderous and trivial, half-truths and some relevant facts about her past.  The pure volume of hateful, ignorant articles can easily lead someone to believe there was malicious intent here.  Why someone who is so much in the public eye would not try harder to ensure her facts are correct boggles my mind.  In this area, I feel celebrities do have a responsibility to their public to not perpetuate rumours.  State your opinions, but be cautious with innuendo.  People will believe you no matter how many times you may come back later admitting you were wrong.

Whoopi’s conclusion that Palin’s speech and reception recalled images of a Nazi rally just amazes me.  I know it’s meant for impact of the reader, but that’s just an embarrassingly ridiculous comparison.  Promoting America is not promoting the “Aryan race”.  Not supporting rights for illegal aliens is not against immigration.  Having strong faith is not rounding up anyone of color, gay or any other minority and putting them in concentration camps.  What I don’t understand is the double standard being employed here.  It’s ok for democrats to talk about their viewpoints or beliefs, but if a republican does they are a nazi?

I really just don’t know how to respond to that last point.  From one of her followup articles, it appears that Whoopi feels there is still a strong desparity between blacks and whites in this country.  I can not disagree with her viewpoint there.  I lack the experience.  The same as I can’t comment on what it’s like being gay in America.  But I can say that stereotyping people is wrong.  I do not judge people on their race, sex, sexual relationships, marital status, age or anything else physically (well, maybe body odor… I don’t like smelly people).  I look at their experience, education, communication, sense of humor, intelligence and passion.  I would hope that I would be subjected to the stereotyping from democrats, but it appears I am.


Related posts

Interesting Parrallel

Posted September 5th, 2008 under , , , ,

I read the following in a customer review on Amazon for The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media’s Favorite Candidate.  Now, I don’t want to come off as a right-wing nutjob.  I’m really trying to spend time understanding how either candidate will be better for the country.  Unfortunately, there are few unbiased discussions taking place, so I end up lurking in the trenches on both ends of the spectrum and usually needing a shower after.

So, back to the comment… one of the things that does concern me about Obama is that several of his plans have a ring of socialism about them.  That’s a non-starter for me.  So, does anyone have any information that shoots holes in the historical parrallels layed out below?  I just don’t know enough here.

 

After reading the book I realized it is the kind of writing that people either ferociously agree with its message or hate the author for undermining someone whose qualifications make him worthy of being elected president of the most powerful nation on Earth. 
I am not going to agree with either side. All I wish to express as a former Cuban exile, is that Barack Obama and Fidel Castro share many personality traits, ie: 
Both were abandoned by their fathers at an early age. 
Both are charming, elocuent lawyers that say exactly what people want to hear at the right time and place. 
One never led the nation to suspect he was a communist at heart, the other doesnt mention the word socialism when in reality this is exactly what his agenda stands for. 
Neither Obama nor Fidel ever held a real job either in government or in private enterprise for they think of themselves as demigods unworthy of soiling their hands when their destiny is much larger than their own realities. 
Both were virtually unknown until they began to use the word “change” as their main political motto. 
Both have egos as tall as the twin towers, yet they manage to present themselves humbly, one in soiled military fatigues and the other sweating and with an undone tie. 
Both have the unique ability to distort truth and lies as if they were the same. 
Both have the ability to hypnotize the ignorant and fool the wishful thinker and to divide a nation in classes, (divide and you shall win) In Fidel’s case he divided the rich against the poor, the illiterate against the educated and the black against the white. 
In Obama’s case even if by omission, he’s de-facto dividing the races already. 
Another resemblance between Obama and Fidel and one that shall never be forgotten is that the American media supported the “Twentieth Century Latin American Liberator” (Time Magazine) with the same degree of irresponsibility devoted to Barack Obama today. 
And lastly I’ll use the words of Jorge Santayana to finish my case in point: “Those who can’t remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” 
And in the words of Sir Winston Churchill: “The inherent vice of Capitalism is the unequal distribution of blessings, the inherent vice of Socialism is the equal distribution of misery. 
GOD SAVE AMERICA! 
Signed: Andrew J. Rodriguez, Author of “Adios, Havana,” a memoir.

Related posts

Brief thautz after McCain’s speech

Posted September 5th, 2008 under , ,
  • only 1 of the 4 acceptance speeches where he really didn’t attack his opponent
  • finally saw him pull his POW story together to represent the personal transformation he went in his character, devotion and love of country; it wasn’t a tool for sympathy or guilt
  • he was upfront about the republican party losing it’s way
  • didn’t alienate the other party by referring to them as the problem
  • stressed joint solutions moving forward
  • good ideas come from everyone and he doesn’t care the source
  • he won’t take credit for other’s ideas regardless the sources
  • like everyone else, he mentioned the issues and gave generalities on solutions, but no details… expecting more from everyone during the debates
  • his wife is total first lady material… has been involved in international issues for decades

I was just really impressed with his “high road” tactics.  He didn’t point fingers, didn’t made personal attacks and really conveyed why he was running for president.  He loves America, sees the problems and sees everyone involved in the solutions.

With Obama, Biden and Palin, I see rifts between the parties.  With people online, I see rifts.  The sentiment is that if you don’t believe in what we believe, you are stupid and not worth discussing the issues with.  There is no compromise.  The media is biased one way or the other.  There is no fair reporting.  There is just so much anger and hypocrisy on both sides that we are failing to discuss the issues and candidates calmly with reason.

I saw none of this with McCain.  I saw a man who was looking to bring two sides together to help build a better future.  I saw a president.

Related posts