Halloween Humor

Posted October 23rd, 2008 under , , ,

Someone sent this to me and I just had to share it with you…

Related posts

A much more detailed argument

Posted October 21st, 2008 under , , , , , , , ,

Let’s face it, there are people more articulate and with more time on their hands to focus on politics (well, you may question that if you follow me on twitter).

It’s no secret I’ll be voting for John McCain come Nov 4.  He’s not a perfect match for the job and there are issues I have with him.  To me, however, the comparison to Barrack Obama puts him ahead.  Here are two articles that do a much better job and summarizing the issues I have with an Obama/Biden presidency.

 
CLOSING THE DEAL
A Roadmap for Campaign 2008’s Homestretch
By Guy Benson (www.guybensonshow.com) and Mary Katharine Ham (www.weeklystandard.com)
Editor and Contributor, Ed Morrissey

Biden Was Wrong On the Cold War 
By Peter Wehner 
ARTICLE
Wall Street Journal   
Publication Date: September 4, 2008

Related posts

Random Thautz for the week 2008-10-19

Posted October 19th, 2008 under
  • @bradlaw CNN can be relied on to report exactly what Obama tells them to… you are right. in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw Yep, Obama has no ties w Ayers: neighbors, O wrote a recommendation 2 A’s book, A kicked off O’s political career in his home in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw Obama & Ayers dont go out for beers, but I believe theyve distanced themselves since run 4 President. Its an issue of judgment in reply to bradlaw #
  • @richmond46 There’s been violence? And intentional actions by McCain or Palin to promote violence? Where’s your proof? in reply to richmond46 #
  • @richmond46 She should call him out, but thats a far cry from U stating “Palin [is] inciting people to violence”. in reply to richmond46 #
  • @richmond46 W/ that logic, I can say Obama supports terrorists because Annenberg project gave money 2 Ayers school (which is a stupid logic) in reply to richmond46 #
  • @richmond46 I agree that is the tactic, but bringing back fear of nat’l sec is far from inciting violence & should speak out against vio … in reply to richmond46 #
  • @richmond46 Awww… so now you are saying McCain & Palin R inciting violence & R racist. Seems every1 is racist if they criticize Obama. in reply to richmond46 #
  • @richmond46 Racism & violence = wrong, no argument. You R making a logic leep that McCain/Palin R promoting these based on one person words in reply to richmond46 #
  • @richmond46 McCain/Palin SHOULD speak out against what the person said in reply to richmond46 #
  • @richmond46 but those words were NOT McCain/Palin’s words nor have I seen them thru action or word support those views in reply to richmond46 #
  • @richmond46 Obama has a series of bad judgments in who he surrounds himself with: terrorists, racists, fanatics & only distanced himself in reply to richmond46 #
  • @richmond46 So can I say Obama promoted Ayers, Wright, Farrakhan, Odinga & others cuz he didnt speak out until pushed on his relationships? in reply to richmond46 #
  • @mike_wescott I know… I won’t defend some of McCain’s tactics, but “true believers” in Obama are blind to facts in reply to mike_wescott #
  • @richmond46 Why does he have tobe asked? Why is he always letting these people into his life? Who will he let into his life when President? in reply to richmond46 #
  • @richmond46 That is my concern: past actions/relationships provide trend 2 future relations/actions. He has shown poor judgment 2 many times in reply to richmond46 #
  • @richmond46 Since Obama hasnt spoken out against ACORN’s voter fraud, does that mean he supports it? (Using your logic, here) in reply to richmond46 #
  • @bunnieblog WOW… I’ve heard of things being bad at work… but wow… in reply to bunnieblog #
  • @richmond46 So, Obama supports this? I haven’t seen him come out against it http://tr.im/cad in reply to richmond46 #
  • Obama pays female staff 27% less than male staff on average http://tr.im/cd6 fair equity in practice #
  • @zik seriously? First U say he panders so is racist, now he tells people to be respectful & u say he’s a racist. U just want him 2b a racist in reply to zik #
  • @zik … because you don’t have anything to complain about him if you can’t paint him as a racist in reply to zik #
  • RT @lagomorph13: Wisconsin voter warns McCain about socialism, ACORN http://tinyurl.com/52rcsr #
  • RT @jgderuvo: Note how the MSM is ignoring the fact that the Tasergate findings include that Monegan’s firing was proper and lawful. #
  • RT @thebookthieves Retweet Obama fanatics care about his Acorn/Ayers/Rezko/PLO ties, great article explains why: http://tinyurl.com/3hmdsz #
  • @DHogan I drove by a house this weekend that had a Kerry/Edwards yard sign. in reply to DHogan #
  • @zik I see the hate, assults on protected groups (age, sex) from Obama followers on twitter&blogs, but nothing from Obama to be respectful in reply to zik #
  • @zik Obama followers spew as much hate & lies as McCain followers- its all wrong, but Ive only seen 1 candidate tell people to B respectful in reply to zik #
  • @zik your claims of McCain “whipping up racist froth” is as disenginous as any claim Obama is a terrorist. You should be proud. Hate 4 Hate in reply to zik #
  • @zik I agree w U on Columbus Day. Never understood Y that would B a “national” holiday. + always wondered where the native american day was in reply to zik #
  • @richmond46 Racism is very much part of America. Its ugly, should B destroyed wherever its found like all prejudism. Mccain isnt racist in reply to richmond46 #
  • @zik as always, I respect you regardless of your blind loyalty ;-) in reply to zik #
  • @zik I’m watching the Obama stream. What irritates me about both of these guys is both take responsibility of personal debt away from voters in reply to zik #
  • @zik “I understand that U went into debt 2 keep up, to get ahead because U had to”… no 1 had to get a credit card, no 1 had to get a house in reply to zik #
  • @richmond46 Short of our choice in candidates, I’d guess we agree on majority of things in reply to richmond46 #
  • nearly 58 million taxable households don’t pay taxes http://tr.im/cfa Over 1/3 & these arent the “top 2%”: wheres their patriotism? #
  • @zik Govt cant balance budget, dont expect voters to, everyone wants an easy way out or find someone to pay their way in reply to zik #
  • @zik agreed, credit system failed when it lowered financial requirements for credit/loans, debtors failed when they borrowed outside means in reply to zik #
  • @zik & govt failed when it forced FNME to push subprime loans for no reason than a sense of entitlement while FNME execs lied 4 big bonuses\ in reply to zik #
  • @zik That’s what it will come to, tho. We R building a dependent society - dependent on govt programs, intervention, support in reply to zik #
  • @zik resulting in sense of personal entitlement & lack of responsibility- its what eventually killed Rome & several founding fathers feared in reply to zik #
  • @zik You equate Iraq w Rome building an empire? Our huge expenditure on Military has little 2 do w military & more 2 do with govt contracts in reply to zik #
  • @zik but I agree that contributed to Romes downfall in reply to zik #
  • @zik our jump in military spending coincides w 9/11. For the most part, it stayed fairly steady for the past 60 years w/ no empire growth in reply to zik #
  • @zik so no comment on the fact that Obama pays women in his office 27% less than men? in reply to zik #
  • @zik we R both pretty entrenched on FNME & neither of our “facts” R going to sway each other - we’ll have to call that one a draw in reply to zik #
  • @zik we definitely have to do cost-benefit analysis on future military “operations”. People wont like that - we want it both ways in reply to zik #
  • @zik both ways as in “not being empiralistic & pushing our agenda” & freeing people from dictators in reply to zik #
  • @zik it’s all risk & cost benefit analysis with human lives vs budget- people cant be responsible w their own debt, they wont do it here in reply to zik #
  • @zik like everything else, it’s not B&W, FNME isnt 100% cause, but its a combination of FNME, Banks, Govt (DEM & REP) involvement in reply to zik #
  • @zik FNME’s portion http://tr.im/chj in reply to zik #
  • @zik I’m talking voter support, not govt use of military. in reply to zik #
  • @zik I’m not arguing presidential use of the military. Every president 4 the past 3 or 4 decades has picked atleast one bad ruler 2 support in reply to zik #
  • @wendelldotme Do you really think @zik needs “ammo” during a debate? That seems a sign of weakness in reply to wendelldotme #
  • @wendelldotme and your “ammo” simply uses the same original article from @zik as it’s source. in reply to wendelldotme #
  • @zik wont argue point w U. Dont feel like researching stats on dictator support & even then ther will B no defacto proof, lets say we agree in reply to zik #
  • @zik but it’d be nice 4 people to acknowledge the good we do, too, but that would be asking for too much - its easier to blame in reply to zik #
  • @zik heh, even when we agree, you argue <g> in reply to zik #
  • @zik if you never praise the good, the children never learn what the right actions are in reply to zik #
  • @zik you imply the US ony does bad by not saying what good we have done in reply to zik #
  • @zik US didnt want 2 get involved in WWI or II until forced. Is that were you want to be? in reply to zik #
  • @zik so you don’t think the father can learn but should be punished? in reply to zik #
  • @zik bad must be punished w/o a doubt, but to ignore all good because of some bad is dishonest and unfair in reply to zik #
  • @zik your analogy isn’t complete… so, the father sexually abuses his child and directly saves 1000 people, punish, save the 1 & save more in reply to zik #
  • @zik I think you fall into the camp of “america is evil” until everyone loves us. I just dont pitch my tent there. in reply to zik #
  • @zik I believe America is fundamentally a good place that has done some bad things in our life & we learn from them & move forward in reply to zik #
  • @zik Then why didn’t Obama release his economic plan last week and “save us all” much sooner? ;-) in reply to zik #
  • @zik so now you are equating America to a dictator? in reply to zik #
  • @zik ha! in reply to zik #
  • @mikedoel yeah, I’m getting counceling\ in reply to mikedoel #
  • My new anthem http://tr.im/cys #
  • @TheBloggess Honestly, unicorns are a menace. I hear their hooves make good chewing gum in reply to TheBloggess #
  • @bradlaw Im not sure what U mean w “whole Ayers issue”. my concern has been w Obamas judgment in who he surrounds himself w& later distances in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw did U recommend her book, provide funding for her business thru group U chaired, did she kickoff Ur political career in her house? in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw did U lie about your relationship with her? Then, no, you shouldnt run for president. How many liars do we need in the white house? in reply to bradlaw #
  • RT @jgderuvo: http://tinyurl.com/47ljvj Howard Stern interviews people who support Obama, asking them if they support McCain’s policies. #
  • Obama supporters cant tell difference between his & McCain’s policies http://tinyurl.com/47ljvj #
  • RT @SEOHack: PLEASE RETWEET: @genochurch’s 14 yr old daughter is missing http://tinyurl.com/5yodvb #
  • RT @jgderuvo: RICO action filed against ACORN in Ohio. Change we CAN believe in! #
  • RT @MichaelTurk: KFQ: More Good News: Obama’s Tax “Cut” http://tinyurl.com/45voot #
  • Detail’s on Obama’s Tax Cut http://tinyurl.com/45voot #
  • @bradlaw Sure, they lie like all politicians lie about their records & records of politicians they R running against, so does Obama #
  • @bradlaw But that’s different than lying about your associations until faced with evidence then simply ignoring the question #
  • @bradlaw again, its less about lies, all politicians lie. Its about judgment in who Obama surrounds himself w Ayers/ACORN/Wright/Rezko/K … #
  • @bradlaw Im assuming by “arab” you mean muslim? Obama says hes Christian, ok. Ultimately, I dont care much about a politicians religion. #
  • @bradlaw Are U a victim of Obama promise of distributed wealth? R U one of the “tax payers” who hasnt paid tax & want a check from my taxes? in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw Has Obama bought your vote with a check for $500 & an empty promise of “change”? in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw re: DNC vetting: I think the political vetting process is all about risk mgmt, what do they think they can ignore/argue away in reply to bradlaw #
  • @seventenths So, you R ok w giving your income tax to people who dont pay income taxes under the guise of a SocialSecurity relief? in reply to seventenths #
  • @seventenths http://tr.im/d81 see description of Obama tax cut plan in reply to seventenths #
  • @seventenths that’s wealth redistribution in reply to seventenths #
  • @bradlaw Plz dont fall into the party line & pull out the nutjobs who support a candidate. Thats meaningless. There R morons supporting both in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw I dont support racists or other idiots, Im guessing U dont support the wacko fringe voting 4 Obama, lets concentrate on candidates in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bigskyman I knew that would be read wrong. I meant that there is a wacko fringe in every support group including Obama in reply to bigskyman #
  • @bigskyman NOT that ALL Obama supporters are the wacko fringe. McCain has them, every1 does. Just dont want to concentrate on them. in reply to bigskyman #
  • @bigskyman PLUS, read those polls, majority of the polls are slanted toward democratic voters answering them (by 10-15%) in reply to bigskyman #
  • @bigskyman More accurate statement would be “majority of those polled support Obama”. They may prove to be accurate. We’ll see Nov 4 in reply to bigskyman #
  • RT @jgderuvo: Obama wrote treasury secretary re: FreddieFannie being in trouble, then voted against legislation to reform it. Change we … #
  • When Clinton & Bush lowered capital gains tax, revenues increased from the tax. Obama wants to raise it. Why? #
  • @MakeMeOver Regardless of the president fact: capitalgains increased under Reagan rev drop capitalgains decreased Clinton/Bush rev increased in reply to MakeMeOver #
  • @MakeMeOver I dont believe BushSr raised capitalgains, It went up in 80s, Clinton lowered 28 to 20, Bush W lowered to 15, revenue increased in reply to MakeMeOver #
  • RT @guesswhoNW: retweet **Small Business Owner Confronts Obama On Raising His Taxes** http://budurl.com/xg5a #
  • @jgderuvo You have my vote for the next Pope in reply to jgderuvo #
  • RT @MichaelTurk: @WiredMonkey When half the country pays no taxes, but gets a tax “rebate” it’s not ridiculous. It’s welfare. #
  • RT @MichaelTurk: @WiredMonkey http://is.gd/48gD 1/3 of all filers had no liability in 2006. giving “95% of working families” a cut would … #
  • @bradlaw I don’t assume U R looking for $500 from any1, but supporting Obama, U support giving $500 “tax rebate” 2 people who dont pay taxes in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw Let them apply for welfare, dont make it automatic in reply to bradlaw #
  • @MakeMeOver I’m assuming U R supporting Obama. I suggest you read up on economy or U will remain poor under him (good to know either way) in reply to MakeMeOver #
  • @bradlaw point about “racists & fringe groups” is they dont represent either candidate & take away from real issues in reply to bradlaw #
  • @BrianJArmstrong increase tax on $250k decreases govt revenue & creation of new jobs, companies reduce workforce and salary increases in reply to BrianJArmstrong #
  • @MakeMeOver Did an unbiased economist explain Obama’s econ policies to U or an Obama supporter? Sales job vs unbiased info in reply to MakeMeOver #
  • @bradlaw So U dont like debating the issues w Obama/McCain, only spouting the talking points? Let’s agree to disagree & move on 2 bug others in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw I agree w U on that advert. Obviously, Obama isno terrorist. Focus should be on his judgment, but campaigns treat us like idiots in reply to bradlaw #
  • that link was broken #
  • @bradlaw Good to meet U - Im IT mgr for a nonprofit in Columbus, Oh - 38 white, married/4kids in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw I don’t expect much different out of tonights debate, but I wish it was true. Just feels like neither candidate answers the qu … in reply to bradlaw #
  • @BrianJArmstrong take what I’ve said about capital gains tax… last 2 presidents lowered it, pres in 80’s increased - increase lowered … in reply to BrianJArmstrong #
  • @BrianJArmstrong people w the $ spent, invested less to save taxes resulting in reduced govt revenue in reply to BrianJArmstrong #
  • @bradlaw Oh, how I wish I didn’t live in a ‘battle ground” state. We get all of the cutthroat ads from all sides. Nov will B a relief in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw Columbus is a great city, otherwise. I’m originally from Minnesota, but love it here. in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw I agree, but it’s sad. I’ll vote for the 1st person to walk away from talking points & answer the question (well, almost <g>) in reply to bradlaw #
  • @bradlaw ha! I’d also vote for the first person who said they’d pass an amendment to force a balanced budget in reply to bradlaw #
  • RT @MichaelTurk: Will the left be as eager to correct the “kill him” story as they were to spread it? http://tinyurl.com/3n9m8k #
  • @bradlaw naw… I like Jimmy Carter, but wouldn’t vote for another one like him. Means well, but bad judgment & unsustainable plans in reply to bradlaw #
  • @AngelaAn10TV Wow… where do you take the not-so-cool friends? in reply to AngelaAn10TV #
  • RT @guykawasaki: North Dakotans are the most outgoing: http://is.gd/49gZ #
  • I hate writing up meeting minutes. Can I do ANYTHING else? #
  • principals need communication training: call I get “your daughter’s bus was in an accident. The EMT wants 2 talk to you” -My daughter is ok #
  • is gonna start inviting everyone to his meetings so he doesn’t have to write minutes… they were there, so they shouldn’t need notes, r … #
  • History repeats and we never learn from it http://tr.im/elv #
  • Create jobs or redistribute wealth? http://tr.im/em2 #

Related posts

Because you didn’t ask for it… here’s my opinion

Posted October 17th, 2008 under , , , , , , , ,

People are posting all over why they are voting for the candidate they are.  Mike Doel gives the reason for HIS post as a sort of reminder to his future self on why he is voting for Obama.  That makes sense and inspired this update from me.  

I’m voting for McCain.  On the various issues, Obama and McCain are not that far apart.  McCain is questionable as a Republican appearing conservative only when compared to Obama’s far left voting record and vocal supporters.  

There is a lot of healing and political bridge building this country needs to undergo and McCain, closer to the middle of the 2 extreme ideologies, is better positioned to serve as catalyst. I’ve seen too much blame finding and finger pointing in Obama’s campaign to believe they are interested in pulling the country together.  We need to start with the foundation that the last several years has given us a president and congress with the worse approval ratings ever.  That represents both parties.  Partisan politics needs to be put aside.  

Government spending needs to be controlled.  Just as citizens are suddenly waking up and realizing that they really do need to be responsible for their bad decisions and debt, so does the government need to be held responsible for living outside it’s means.  The economy is critical.  This isn’t McCain’s background, but neither is it Obama’s.  Either candidate will surround himself with strong advisers and both have shown they’ll bring in experts from the field with practical experience. The difference comes down to their interpretation of the American dream.  Obama seems to feel everyone is entitled to financial success and frequently discusses redistributing wealth through taxation.  Obama says that 95% of Americans won’t see a tax increase and will probably see a tax decrease.  The problem he ignores is that only about 50% of Americans actually pay taxes.  The rest either pay nothing or get their money back in refunds.  The people who fall into this category are the low/middle class.  So, he’ll give them larger refunds to compensate for the social security tax coming out of their salaries.  Now, we have the income tax paying for social security for 50% of the population and not covering government spending.  That’s why he needs to raise taxes for the “larger” small businesses and most successful Americans.  His plan will create a welfare state where half the population is dependent on the other half.  McCain believes that people be given equal opportunity to work hard and build wealth and through this jobs are created and the economy improves.  Are there problems with his plan?  Sure.  I look at it this way, however.  If I got myself in so much debt that I was spending more than I made, I would stop all of my spending, build a budget that included paying off my debt that allowed me to live within my means.  It would also account for taking care of my children and their education.  McCain is ready to do this at the government level.  Obama isn’t.

As far as healthcare goes, neither candidate has put forth a sustainable plan that really will make a difference.  It’s a wash.

Energy independence will be critical for us and both McCain and Obama agree.  Again, it’s on execution that they differ.  Obama wants to be Kennedy and invest trillions into government programs to create alternative energy sources.  While Kennedy did get to the moon, he started with a better economic footing and still wasted huge amounts in government contracts.  Obama is also disingenuous on his talk of nuclear and domestic/offshore drilling.  He wants to leap frog right into alternative energy with no plan on how to migrate there.  Anyone in IT knows it’s easy to design a new system, but the work comes in how you sustain your current users and migrate them to the new platform.  McCain is strong on the sustain and migrate plan, but, I agree, is weak on the longterm.  He needs to strengthen his funding for alternative sources, but understands where the investments need to go to (domestic/offshore drilling, nuclear and clean coal for oil independence; nuclear, air, wind, solar, others for alternative fuel moving forward).  McCain wants to setup multi-million $ prizes for corporations/individuals who come up with viable alternative energy solutions.  I think this is good, will motivate Americans and draws on the competition that makes this country great, but it’s no where near enough.

Finally, and probably ultimately, it comes down to what I view as the judgment of the person running.  First, let’s get a few things out of the way.  Politicians lie. They all do. You can describe it as playing with the truth, but any distortion of the truth is a lie in my view. Campaigns do it and so do the politicians they back.  If you don’t believe your candidate does, you are naive.  So, that brings me back to the people.  If you can’t believe what they tell you or really pay much attention to their voting record (a bill for medical support of late term failed abortions could contain something tacked on completely unrelated or be filled with other pork spending), you have to go by who they surround themselves with.  I don’t believe Obama is a domestic terrorist, racist or slum lord, but he tends to surround himself with these people and only after being asked about them does he distance himself.  A politician will meet all kinds of people.  A person aspiring for the presidency (which he has for much longer then 2 years) should be more sensitive to who is around him.  Obama doesn’t seem to care.  That shows poor judgment to me.  Who he has done business with in the past, who he has associated with, who he has worshiped with is indicative on who he will associate with in the future and allow to come close and influence him.  That’s his business.  But if he’s president, that’s my business, too.

Now, because Doug wants to rile me up and I’m argumentative by nature, I have a few comments on Mike’s reasons for voting for Obama:

1) Obama will invest more in renewable energy - I don’t disagree.  Obama will throw lots and lots of money at renewable energy w/o cutting anything out of fear of taking away some special interest’s cash cow throwing us into even more astronomical debt.  It’s a gambit that MIGHT work, but there’s no way to prove my case until after the fact.

2) He wants to teach the Republican Party a lesson and punish them for poor decisions/leadership.  I don’t think picking a candidate that represents a party as guilty of poor decisions/leadership will teach anyone a lesson.  I haven’t really sat down to classify my political party affiliation and probably won’t.  There are issues I identify with various parties on.  What Mike is forgetting is that these parties represent Americans.  The politicians won’t understand, care about his point or learn from his “lesson”.

But, as he says, I don’t believe I will sway your vote or opinion.  As I’ve said quite a few times on Twitter lately, he and I will have to agree to disagree.  I respect everyone’s right to their opinion.  I won’t tell you to vote for McCain because of my beliefs.  I will only ask you to go out, do your own research.  Check factcheck.org and other such sites. Read the propaganda from each candidate.  While they are riddled with lies, there is truth on both sides.  Don’t blindly believe what your campaign is telling you, their talking points or the mass media.  There is truth out there, but no one is going to give it to you.  You have to find it.  Also, talk about your opinions and candidates.  Not just with people who are voting the same as you, but with people on the other side.  Debate with them.  If your beliefs can’t hold up to a debate with your neighbor, blog post, twitter discussion, maybe you need to change them?  Remember that the world is not black and white, but many shades of gray.  Like I told my son this week, both Obama and McCain are good men.  They ultimately want what’s best for our nation. It’s our responsibility as citizens to decide which has the background, fortitude and well-meaning to help us. 

So, I’m simply going to ask you to go vote.  Vote with your heart and with your head.

Related posts

Something to do with Pumpkins

Posted October 16th, 2008 under , , , ,

it’s october and time to harvest my pumpkins in the backyard.  I usually have mixed results with the seeds, so I’m gonna try a recipe my friend Kate shared with me:

TOASTED PUMPKIN SEEDS

1 Quart of water
2 T. Salt
2 C. Pumpkin Seeds
1 T. Unsalted Butter

Preheat oven to 350 degrees. Bring water and salt to a boil. Add Seeds and boil for 10 min. (or 15 if large).

Combine seeds and butter in a roasting pan or cookie sheet and toss until butter is melted and seeds are evenly coated.

Roast for 25-45 min or until seeds are crisp and golden, stirring and tossing often.

Cool the seeds and pack in an airtight container.

I’ll post my pumpkin cookie and pumpkin roll recipes another day.

Related posts