Archive for the ‘american president’ Category

It’s an Obama Nation

Posted January 21st, 2009 under

Yesterday, I did the following tweet:

It’s an Obama Nation… That works no matter your point of view and on so many levels.
 from TweetDeck

A friend called me on it with a reference to a post I made criticizing name calling and other negativities that came out of this election.

I still stand by that post.   I’m not calling the President an abomination. I’m using the negative implication of “Obama Nation” in response to the worship and blind adoration taking place.  Here are a couple of examples:

1) His staff said one of the first things he would do when entering office was close gitmo. Turns out that was more campaign rhetoric. Once elected, he backed off from that.

2) The inaugural fund for yesterday had a budget of $41m. When Bush spent the full budget 8 years ago, the media pounded him. Yesterday cost over $150m. What was the coverage? Isn’t this glorious?

A fellow twitter of mine pointed out an article on Media Matters that states this is an apples to oranges comparison.  They suggest the Bush number’s don’t represent the cost of security and other items and if those were added, they would be similar.  I’m adding a link here for transparency, but I have an issue with it.  There seems no more evidence on that article than to the contrary.  The article even states organizations such as MSNBC is reporting the ~$150m number.

Obviously, there has to be security for the inauguration day activities and I wouldn’t possibly believe they shouldn’t occur, but here are the facts:

  • The inauguration activities still cost more than was budgeted
  • Bush was reemed in the press for spending within the budget (max amount) during a time of war
  • No one is being critical of Obama spending over the budget amount during a time of war AND economic crisis
  • While there needed to be a celebration, did they really need 11 balls?

Overall, this is a bad example to set when the nation needs to learn how to be fiscally responsible.

3) The hollywood nitwits put out videos like this:  

Now they are going to start doing those things? They need a president they voted for before they act like responsible, engaged citizens? And they are proud of that?

Yes, I still stand by that post.

Related posts

Notice to All Employees

Posted October 28th, 2008 under

Sent from a friend…

Notice to All Employees

As of November 5, 2008, when Obama is officially elected into office, our company will install a few new policies which are in keeping with his new, inspiring issues of change and fairness:

1. All salespeople will be pooling their sales commissions into a common pool that will be divided equally between all of you. This will serve to give those of you who are underachieving a ‘fair shake.’

2. All hourly employees will be pooling their wages, including overtime, into a common pool, dividing it equally amongst yourselves. This will help those who are ‘too busy for overtime’ to reap the rewards from those who have more spare time and can work extra hours.

3. All top management will now be referred to as ‘the government.’ We will not participate in this ‘pooling’ experience because the law doesn’t apply to us.

4. The ‘government’ will give eloquent speeches to all employees every week, encouraging its workers to continue to work hard ‘for the good of all.’

5. The employees will be thrilled with these new policies because it’s ‘good to spread the wealth..’ Those of you who have underachieved will finally get an opportunity; those of you who have worked hard and had success will feel more ‘patriotic.’

6. The last few people who were hired should clean out their desks. Don’t feel bad though, because President Obama will give you ‘FREE’ healthcare, ‘FREE’ handouts, ‘FREE’ oil for heating your home, ‘FREE’ food stamps, and he’ll let you stay in your home for as long as you want even if you can’t pay your mortgage. If you appeal directly to our democratic congress, you might even get a free flat screen TV and a coupon for free haircuts (shouldn’t all Americans be entitled to a flat screen TV and a nice looking hair?) !!! If for any reason you are not happy with the new policies, you may want to re-think your vote on November 4th.

Related posts

A much more detailed argument

Posted October 21st, 2008 under

Let’s face it, there are people more articulate and with more time on their hands to focus on politics (well, you may question that if you follow me on twitter).

It’s no secret I’ll be voting for John McCain come Nov 4.  He’s not a perfect match for the job and there are issues I have with him.  To me, however, the comparison to Barrack Obama puts him ahead.  Here are two articles that do a much better job and summarizing the issues I have with an Obama/Biden presidency.

 
CLOSING THE DEAL
A Roadmap for Campaign 2008’s Homestretch
By Guy Benson (www.guybensonshow.com) and Mary Katharine Ham (www.weeklystandard.com)
Editor and Contributor, Ed Morrissey

Biden Was Wrong On the Cold War 
By Peter Wehner 
ARTICLE
Wall Street Journal   
Publication Date: September 4, 2008

Related posts

Because you didn’t ask for it… here’s my opinion

Posted October 17th, 2008 under ,

People are posting all over why they are voting for the candidate they are.  Mike Doel gives the reason for HIS post as a sort of reminder to his future self on why he is voting for Obama.  That makes sense and inspired this update from me.  

I’m voting for McCain.  On the various issues, Obama and McCain are not that far apart.  McCain is questionable as a Republican appearing conservative only when compared to Obama’s far left voting record and vocal supporters.  

There is a lot of healing and political bridge building this country needs to undergo and McCain, closer to the middle of the 2 extreme ideologies, is better positioned to serve as catalyst. I’ve seen too much blame finding and finger pointing in Obama’s campaign to believe they are interested in pulling the country together.  We need to start with the foundation that the last several years has given us a president and congress with the worse approval ratings ever.  That represents both parties.  Partisan politics needs to be put aside.  

Government spending needs to be controlled.  Just as citizens are suddenly waking up and realizing that they really do need to be responsible for their bad decisions and debt, so does the government need to be held responsible for living outside it’s means.  The economy is critical.  This isn’t McCain’s background, but neither is it Obama’s.  Either candidate will surround himself with strong advisers and both have shown they’ll bring in experts from the field with practical experience. The difference comes down to their interpretation of the American dream.  Obama seems to feel everyone is entitled to financial success and frequently discusses redistributing wealth through taxation.  Obama says that 95% of Americans won’t see a tax increase and will probably see a tax decrease.  The problem he ignores is that only about 50% of Americans actually pay taxes.  The rest either pay nothing or get their money back in refunds.  The people who fall into this category are the low/middle class.  So, he’ll give them larger refunds to compensate for the social security tax coming out of their salaries.  Now, we have the income tax paying for social security for 50% of the population and not covering government spending.  That’s why he needs to raise taxes for the “larger” small businesses and most successful Americans.  His plan will create a welfare state where half the population is dependent on the other half.  McCain believes that people be given equal opportunity to work hard and build wealth and through this jobs are created and the economy improves.  Are there problems with his plan?  Sure.  I look at it this way, however.  If I got myself in so much debt that I was spending more than I made, I would stop all of my spending, build a budget that included paying off my debt that allowed me to live within my means.  It would also account for taking care of my children and their education.  McCain is ready to do this at the government level.  Obama isn’t.

As far as healthcare goes, neither candidate has put forth a sustainable plan that really will make a difference.  It’s a wash.

Energy independence will be critical for us and both McCain and Obama agree.  Again, it’s on execution that they differ.  Obama wants to be Kennedy and invest trillions into government programs to create alternative energy sources.  While Kennedy did get to the moon, he started with a better economic footing and still wasted huge amounts in government contracts.  Obama is also disingenuous on his talk of nuclear and domestic/offshore drilling.  He wants to leap frog right into alternative energy with no plan on how to migrate there.  Anyone in IT knows it’s easy to design a new system, but the work comes in how you sustain your current users and migrate them to the new platform.  McCain is strong on the sustain and migrate plan, but, I agree, is weak on the longterm.  He needs to strengthen his funding for alternative sources, but understands where the investments need to go to (domestic/offshore drilling, nuclear and clean coal for oil independence; nuclear, air, wind, solar, others for alternative fuel moving forward).  McCain wants to setup multi-million $ prizes for corporations/individuals who come up with viable alternative energy solutions.  I think this is good, will motivate Americans and draws on the competition that makes this country great, but it’s no where near enough.

Finally, and probably ultimately, it comes down to what I view as the judgment of the person running.  First, let’s get a few things out of the way.  Politicians lie. They all do. You can describe it as playing with the truth, but any distortion of the truth is a lie in my view. Campaigns do it and so do the politicians they back.  If you don’t believe your candidate does, you are naive.  So, that brings me back to the people.  If you can’t believe what they tell you or really pay much attention to their voting record (a bill for medical support of late term failed abortions could contain something tacked on completely unrelated or be filled with other pork spending), you have to go by who they surround themselves with.  I don’t believe Obama is a domestic terrorist, racist or slum lord, but he tends to surround himself with these people and only after being asked about them does he distance himself.  A politician will meet all kinds of people.  A person aspiring for the presidency (which he has for much longer then 2 years) should be more sensitive to who is around him.  Obama doesn’t seem to care.  That shows poor judgment to me.  Who he has done business with in the past, who he has associated with, who he has worshiped with is indicative on who he will associate with in the future and allow to come close and influence him.  That’s his business.  But if he’s president, that’s my business, too.

Now, because Doug wants to rile me up and I’m argumentative by nature, I have a few comments on Mike’s reasons for voting for Obama:

1) Obama will invest more in renewable energy – I don’t disagree.  Obama will throw lots and lots of money at renewable energy w/o cutting anything out of fear of taking away some special interest’s cash cow throwing us into even more astronomical debt.  It’s a gambit that MIGHT work, but there’s no way to prove my case until after the fact.

2) He wants to teach the Republican Party a lesson and punish them for poor decisions/leadership.  I don’t think picking a candidate that represents a party as guilty of poor decisions/leadership will teach anyone a lesson.  I haven’t really sat down to classify my political party affiliation and probably won’t.  There are issues I identify with various parties on.  What Mike is forgetting is that these parties represent Americans.  The politicians won’t understand, care about his point or learn from his “lesson”.

But, as he says, I don’t believe I will sway your vote or opinion.  As I’ve said quite a few times on Twitter lately, he and I will have to agree to disagree.  I respect everyone’s right to their opinion.  I won’t tell you to vote for McCain because of my beliefs.  I will only ask you to go out, do your own research.  Check factcheck.org and other such sites. Read the propaganda from each candidate.  While they are riddled with lies, there is truth on both sides.  Don’t blindly believe what your campaign is telling you, their talking points or the mass media.  There is truth out there, but no one is going to give it to you.  You have to find it.  Also, talk about your opinions and candidates.  Not just with people who are voting the same as you, but with people on the other side.  Debate with them.  If your beliefs can’t hold up to a debate with your neighbor, blog post, twitter discussion, maybe you need to change them?  Remember that the world is not black and white, but many shades of gray.  Like I told my son this week, both Obama and McCain are good men.  They ultimately want what’s best for our nation. It’s our responsibility as citizens to decide which has the background, fortitude and well-meaning to help us. 

So, I’m simply going to ask you to go vote.  Vote with your heart and with your head.

Related posts

More Fairness in Politics and Blogging

Posted September 19th, 2008 under

Like I’ve said, character and honesty are critical for me in relating to a person.  A reflection of who a person is is the people he surrounds himself with.

Senator Obama has stated his disdain for the prejudice comments by Reverend Wright and the terrorist actions of Bill Ayers.  Obama didn’t do those things and as soon as the press let him know about the actions of these loose associations in his , it took him less then a couple of months to distance himself and state his dislike for what they did (and that he was unaware of the hateful things they said/did).

I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.  Why would a politician play with the truth?

Now, we have the Post reporting that Obama’s campaign reached out Franklin Raines for advice on the economy and mortgate industry.  Further, we know that James Johnson was in charge of Obama’s VP selection team until there was too much criticism.  Who cares, really, right?  Oh, Raines and Johnson used to run FNME (Fannie Mae) during the periods when it was discovered that they artificially inflated their reported revenue, used suspect business practices in granting loans and other illegal activities.  Both left FNME after receiving MILLIONS (like $50m in Raines’ case) in bonuses.  

Further, there’s the protest of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s visit to the UN.  Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin were both invited.  When Clinton found out Palin was coming, she pulled out.  In order to remain party neutral, the group reached out to Biden and the Obama campaign to send someone else.  They refused.  The group then got pressure from other democrats to either disinvite Palin or cancel the rally.  So, they disinvited her.  What kind of crap is this?  It’s more important to ensure Palin doesn’t attend than it is to protest Iran’s ruler?

Related posts

  • Hey, it’s a “Tag Cloud”

    advice blog stuff columbus companies Droid lessons learned life management ohio random news The Bloggess tweets